Yes. A Texas court of appeals has also ruled that, even though the seller and buyer of real estate had agreed in their contract of sale that the property was being sold “as is,” the buyer could, nonetheless, still bring a claim under the SWDA for costs of remediating the property for contamination existing at the time of the sale.
The court reasoned that a cause of action under SWDA is different in that the claim is not a damages claim based on misrepresentation or failure to disclose but instead a statutory claim for cleanup costs, in which the causation issues are not present. On this basis, the court held that a “responsible party” under the SWDA will be held liable “without the need to establish causation.”
With respect to CERCLA liability, the majority of the courts have also held that an “as is” clause precludes only claims for breach of warranty, but does not operate to release strict liability arising under a statutory cause of action created by CERCLA.
Do you have questions? You can get our FREE ebook, Environmental Litigation: What Every Attorney and Environmental Professional Needs to Know, just by providing your name and email address at this link. We promise your information won’t be shared with third persons. And if you’d like to speak with me about your case, I welcome your phone call at 972-850-8490. I look forward to speaking with you.