Section 107(a)(2)(B) of CERCLA states, in pertinent part, that PRPs shall be liable for “necessary costs of response incurred by any other person consistent with the national contingency plan (NCP).” In order to show that the costs incurred were “necessary,” a party must show that: (1) the costs were incurred in response to a threat to human health or the environment, and (2) the costs were necessary to address the threat.
CERCLA liability only attaches where a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance causes the incurrence of response costs. To the extent the actions were taken for purposes other than responding to an actual and real public health threat, there is no CERCLA liability.
Do you have questions? You can get our FREE ebook, Environmental Litigation: What Every Attorney and Environmental Professional Needs to Know, just by providing your name and email address at this link. We promise your information won’t be shared with third persons. And if you’d like to speak with me about your case, I welcome your phone call at 972-850-8490. I look forward to speaking with you.